MODERN TIMES

Art Hobson

ahobson@uark.edu

NWA Times 2009

 

Narrowing the achievement gap at FHS

 

 

         Congratulations to Fayetteville schools for opening a welcome dialog on whether, and how, Fayetteville High School needs to change its teaching methods.   They sparked it by distributing 2,000 copies of Tony Wagner's book "The Global Achievement Gap" to interested citizens, sponsoring three community discussions of the book, and bringing Wagner here this Monday at 6:30 pm in the Fayetteville Town Center.  I'll be out of town, but I hope you'll be there.

         Wagner's book has been criticized and praised in these pages.  One reviewer noted that the book lacks research-based evidence for its claims, but I found Wagner's many interviews to be reasonable evidence for most of his conclusions.  Furthermore, there's little doubt about the book's overarching theme, namely that teachers must "actively engage" students much more fully by requiring them to think, discuss, write, invent, reason, imagine, speak, and problem-solve.  They must be involved in their own learning rather than passively listening to lectures and memorizing facts.  By now there are tons of careful research supporting this conclusion.  Fayetteville schools should pay attention to this.  Teachers whose students aren't thinking for themselves are missing the point.

         Wagner starts with some unsettling facts:  America's 70 percent high school graduation rate is well behind most industrialized countries.  Only a third of our high school graduates are ready for college, and most college professors report that high schools do not prepare students for college.  Students will need at least some postsecondary education to earn a decent wage.  America ranks tenth in its college completion rate. Most young people are politically apathetic and don't vote (although 2008 might have changed that).  Students are graduating from high school and college unprepared for the world of work.

         Wagner offers several somewhat radical suggestions, all leaning toward active engagement.  He agrees with Thomas Friedman's "The World is Flat" that young Americans are in competition with developing countries for middle-class jobs and he's concerned that Americans are not acquiring the skills needed in this new world of work.  He's also concerned that, despite the mounting sense of dread provoked by the daily news, classrooms mostly ignore issues such as the Iraq war and global warming.  Teachers he interviewed were unable to address such issues because they felt obligated to spend all their class time covering detailed content requirements and preparing students for standardized tests.  He's skeptical that content-oriented, test-oriented education is preparing either competitive workers or thoughtful citizens.

         Specifically, students need to learn several key "survival skills":  critical thinking based on evidence and reason, problem solving ability, how to collaborate with others, how to adapt to new circumstances, individual initiative, effective written and oral communication, assessment of information, and imaginative vision.  Note that these are not traditional subject-matter fields, but rather skills that must be developed through practice.  Wagner doesn't reject traditional education in academic subjects, but he regards it as secondary to developing real-world survival skills.

         Wagner is leery of No Child Left Behind and state standards, with their implied emphasis on testing.  He opposes not so much the tests themselves as the great gobs of time spent preparing for them, claiming that "there is only one curriculum in American public schools today:  test-prep."  He states that NCLB's main impact is its contribution to the gap--the achievement gap--between what's being taught and what needs to be learned.

         He criticizes state academic content standards as too extensive, too detailed, too content-oriented, and insufficiently concerned with competencies for work, citizenship, and life-long learning.  "In today's world," he claims, "it's no longer how much you know that matters; it's what you can do with what you know." 

         He's leery too of AP courses, claiming that they are a mile wide and an inch deep and cannot prepare students for true college-level work.  He claims that, rather than teaching students to think through the subject matter, these courses "teach to" the AP tests and encourage rote memorization. 

         In light of all this criticism, what's to be done?  One suggestion is that teachers and supervisors should observe, record on videotape, and discuss each other's teaching and supervision.  He regards this as the single most effective strategy for improving instruction.  Yet it's almost never done.  

         He emphasizes active engagement, a method that harks back to Socrates, who taught by asking questions.  The idea is that students working alone or in groups should think through questions for themselves, with guidance from instructors.

         Wagner closes his book with three exemplary coalitions of schools that work.  All individual schools are small (400 to 800 students total in grades 9-12) but self-contained.  Two of the three are charter schools.  Students are not tracked by ability, so there are no "college-bound" or "non-college-bound" students or courses.  There are no AP courses.  Teachers do not teach to state tests (although students take some such tests, and generally do well).  Much academic content is taught through interdisciplinary projects, and students pass to the next grade on the basis of these projects.  Students spend considerable time in work or community project internships.  Sports are absent or de-emphasized.  Teachers are judged by the quality of their students' work.  Each coalition has a set of learning goals that are similar to Wagner's survival skills.  Teachers are intensely engaged with students and know each student well.  There's a lot of group communication.  School campuses or buildings receive little emphasis, and some are quite modest.  One campus that might be relevant to Fayetteville's notion of dividing a single campus into smaller learning centers is High Tech High, where the main campus comprises a village of six small (about 400 students) schools situated on the grounds of a former naval training facility in San Diego. 

         Fayetteville High School should encourage active engagement.  Wagner's many other ideas might or might not be adopted here, but his book stirs the pot in a useful way.

LINK TO ART HOBSON'S HOMEPAGE